Transport ’45: A rail-first reset for Switzerland’s long-term transport policy
Article Summary
Source-basedSwitzerland’s government has unveiled the strategic framework for Transport ’45, a long-term plan to shape the country’s rail, road and urban transport networks through to 2045. Although branded as intermodal, Transport ’45 is fundamentally a rail-first plan, prioritising capacity and frequency while cutting back on weaker projects. Here’s how the two-decade plan breaks down.
Switzerland’s government has unveiled the strategic framework for Transport ’45, a long-term plan to shape the country’s rail, road and urban transport networks through to 2045. Although branded as intermodal, Transport ’45 is fundamentally a rail-first plan, prioritising capacity and frequency while cutting back on weaker projects.
Presenting the plan in Bern on Wednesday, Federal Councillor Albert Rösti framed Transport ’45 as a generational exercise rather than a routine infrastructure update. “Transport projects have to be planned decades in advance if they are to be available when they are actually needed,” he said. “That is why it is our task today to secure transport policy for the next generation.”The framework draws heavily on an expert review from Swiss university ETH Zurich, commissioned after rail expansion costs ballooned and Swiss voters rejected parts of the national motorway programme in 2023. According to Rösti, the review showed that Switzerland had reached the limits of incremental planning. Implementing the previously agreed 2035 rail service concept in full would cost at least CHF 14bn (€15.26bn) more than budgeted, unless priorities were reset.
The response is Transport ’45: for the first time, Switzerland will bundle rail, road and urban transport expansion into a single consultation package, backed by a new financing push and tighter rules on which projects make the cut.
Near-term rail capacity gains
In the short to medium term, the Federal Council is proposing targeted rail upgrades designed to deliver tangible timetable improvements by the mid-2030s:
By 2030: improved connections on the Biel/Bienne–Lausanne–Geneva corridor, including significant works around Renens.
By 2035 (≈ CHF 3bn / €3.27bn):
15-minute services between Zurich and Bern
30-minute services on Bern–Lucerne and Basel–Zurich
Systematic half-hourly regional services across the Swiss Plateau
Further options under review include denser regional services between Geneva and Lausanne, higher frequencies between Bellinzona and Locarno, and longer trains enabled by extended platforms on the Zurich S-Bahn
Christa Hostettler, director of the Federal Office of Transport, said the aim was to refocus rail expansion around customer benefit and deliverable steps. “In future, only mature projects will be submitted to Parliament for approval,” she said. “This focus is essential if we want to plan services, projects and costs more reliably again.”
Megaprojects, but sequenced
Looking further ahead to a 2045 horizon, the Federal Council endorsed a set of major rail schemes broadly aligned with ETH Zurich’s recommendations. These include:
Neuchâtel–La Chaux-de-Fonds direct line
Expansion of Geneva Cornavin and Basel SBB
Zimmerberg Base Tunnel II
A fourth track at Zurich Stadelhofen
Lucerne through-station (phase one)
The Grimsel Tunnel, conditional on integration with an existing power transmission line and proactive regional development planning
Together, these projects carry a price tag of at least CHF 10bn (€10.9bn). A further CHF 7bn (€7.64bn) of projects, including the Morges–Perroy line and Lucerne through-station phase two, are earmarked for submission to Parliament in 2031.
At the same time, the government is explicitly preparing to walk away from some previously approved schemes. The Swiss transport ministry, DETEC, will use the June 2026 consultation to identify which rail projects should be postponed or abandoned outright.
Funding rail, and tightening the rules
Central to Transport ’45 is the decision to seek an extension of the VAT surcharge that feeds the Rail Infrastructure Fund (BIF) beyond its current 2030 expiry. The Federal Council estimates this would generate around CHF 8bn (€8.72bn) in additional rail funding by 2045.
“Extending the VAT surcharge is a prerequisite if rail infrastructure is not only to be renewed, but also expanded,” Hostettler said. The extension would require parliamentary approval and a public vote.
Alongside funding, the government is imposing stricter delivery rules. Projects must reach a defined preliminary design stage before entering an expansion phase, and greater flexibility in technical standards is expected to curb cost escalation.
Digitalisation also plays a central role. Rösti confirmed that CHF 2bn (€2.18bn) has been reserved for digital rail systems, with the explicit aim of unlocking capacity on existing infrastructure. “The goal is to use existing lines more efficiently and increase capacity without additional major construction,” he said, pointing to ERTMS-enabled shorter headways as a key lever.
What happens next, and what changes in how Switzerland builds rail
Transport ’45 now moves into a formal consultation phase, with DETEC due to publish the draft by end-June 2026. After that, the Federal Council plans to submit a message to Parliament in early 2027, with parliamentary consideration through 2027 and — if the process holds — a public vote as early as 2028, tied to the VAT mechanism that underpins the rail funding envelope.
The sequencing is important because the government is explicitly coupling the investment pipeline to financing legitimacy. In the Q&A, Rösti made clear that Transport ’45 is being designed as a coherent package rather than a menu of standalone schemes; if voters or Parliament reject the VAT extension, the rail programme would have to be reprioritised. “It would be difficult to say already now which project we would not build, because it is an overall strategy — a coherent package,” he said, adding that without approval, “we would have to discuss again, prioritise again, and make a new proposal.”
At the same time, the consultation will be where DETEC spells out the politically sensitive part Switzerland has so far only signalled: which previously approved projects should be delayed or dropped. Hostettler also indicated that the Federal Council will use the June consultation to decide which elements of the 2030 and 2035 service concepts are still required, which can be pushed back, and which may be abandoned.
The shift is also about how projects advance through the system. Rösti said the government wants to stop approving ideas that later explode in cost, and instead force delivery discipline earlier in the pipeline. “Project costs must align with budgets. We have to develop a ‘design-to-cost’ approach,” he said.
Read more:
UK, Switzerland forge ahead with direct train link plans – but how close are we really?
Solar panels under a train? Switzerland starts testing first rail-mounted solar power plant
SBB looking to lease 40 new high-speed trains in Swiss first
Tags:
ERTMS
European rail policy
rail capacity
rail digitalisation
rail funding
rail infrastructure
rail investment
rail megaprojects
rail policy
Swiss Federal Council
Swiss rail
Switzerland
timetable frequency
Transport ’45
Zurich–Bern
E-mailFacebook𝕏TwitterLinkedInWhatsApp
Author: Thomas Wintle
E-mailURL
Related posts
track redesignLatvia’s Rail Baltica chief expects 3-5 year delay of the first phase
The first phase of Rail Baltica will face a delay of three to five years, according to Maris Dzelme, board. chairman of Latvia’s project’s manager, Eiropas Dzelzcela Linijas…
29 January 2026
'Embarrassing'‘We’ve lost our way’: UK MPs reject plan to put rail electrification into GBR’s legal duties
UK parliament has rejected a proposed amendment to the Railways Bill that would have required Great British Railways (GBR) to commit to a rolling programme of rail electrification,…
29 January 2026
Adamuz and CataloniaSpain approves €20m aid package for train crash victims
Spain’s government has approved a €20 million compensation package for victims of the January train crashes in Adamuz in Córdoba and Gelida in Catalonia, moving to accelerate payouts…
28 January 2026
Add your comment
characters remaining.
Log in through one of the following social media partners to comment.
FacebookGoogleLinkedIn
Railtech Europe '26‘If Europe pauses now, a decade of rail investment could go to waste’: UNIFE chief UNIFE Director General Enno Wiebe has warned that Europe risks surrendering its global...
Deadline February 6Submit your innovation for the RailTech Innovation Award Submissions for the RailTech Innovation Award are open again! The prize for the...
Sign up for the RailTech Newsletter
Receive the latest news from the railway sector directly into your mailbox!
year at a glanceNew connections, construction milestones and policy developments: here’s what 2026 will bring EU rail From new cross-border train connections to developments in ambitious infrastructure projects, and from...
ferromobileNot trains, but vans are set to revive France’s abandoned railway tracks Rusty rails will soon meet high-tech innovation: abandoned tracks in the Auvergne region...
Partners
Top posts
Most read
Budapest-Belgrade trains by spring? Hungary’s section could open in February, pending a safety audit
Manchester Mayor clashes with Labour Party and the sector over Northern Powerhouse Rail
Shut out of Temple Mills, Italy’s FS is still targeting a Channel Tunnel launch - one year before Virgin
Nine-day rail closure north of Edinburgh as electrification work ramps up
Rail Baltica: LTG Infra blocked again from signing €100m signalling contract after Alstom challengeThe framework draws heavily on an expert review from Swiss university ETH Zurich, commissioned after rail expansion costs ballooned and Swiss voters rejected parts of the national motorway programme in 2023. According to Rösti, the review showed that Switzerland had reached the limits of incremental planning. Implementing the previously agreed 2035 rail service concept in full would cost at least CHF 14bn (€15.26bn) more than budgeted, unless priorities were reset.
The response is Transport ’45: for the first time, Switzerland will bundle rail, road and urban transport expansion into a single consultation package, backed by a new financing push and tighter rules on which projects make the cut.
Near-term rail capacity gains
In the short to medium term, the Federal Council is proposing targeted rail upgrades designed to deliver tangible timetable improvements by the mid-2030s:
By 2030: improved connections on the Biel/Bienne–Lausanne–Geneva corridor, including significant works around Renens.
By 2035 (≈ CHF 3bn / €3.27bn):
15-minute services between Zurich and Bern
30-minute services on Bern–Lucerne and Basel–Zurich
Systematic half-hourly regional services across the Swiss Plateau
Further options under review include denser regional services between Geneva and Lausanne, higher frequencies between Bellinzona and Locarno, and longer trains enabled by extended platforms on the Zurich S-Bahn
Christa Hostettler, director of the Federal Office of Transport, said the aim was to refocus rail expansion around customer benefit and deliverable steps. “In future, only mature projects will be submitted to Parliament for approval,” she said. “This focus is essential if we want to plan services, projects and costs more reliably again.”
Megaprojects, but sequenced
Looking further ahead to a 2045 horizon, the Federal Council endorsed a set of major rail schemes broadly aligned with ETH Zurich’s recommendations. These include:
Neuchâtel–La Chaux-de-Fonds direct line
Expansion of Geneva Cornavin and Basel SBB
Zimmerberg Base Tunnel II
A fourth track at Zurich Stadelhofen
Lucerne through-station (phase one)
The Grimsel Tunnel, conditional on integration with an existing power transmission line and proactive regional development planning
Together, these projects carry a price tag of at least CHF 10bn (€10.9bn). A further CHF 7bn (€7.64bn) of projects, including the Morges–Perroy line and Lucerne through-station phase two, are earmarked for submission to Parliament in 2031.
At the same time, the government is explicitly preparing to walk away from some previously approved schemes. The Swiss transport ministry, DETEC, will use the June 2026 consultation to identify which rail projects should be postponed or abandoned outright.
Funding rail, and tightening the rules
Central to Transport ’45 is the decision to seek an extension of the VAT surcharge that feeds the Rail Infrastructure Fund (BIF) beyond its current 2030 expiry. The Federal Council estimates this would generate around CHF 8bn (€8.72bn) in additional rail funding by 2045.
“Extending the VAT surcharge is a prerequisite if rail infrastructure is not only to be renewed, but also expanded,” Hostettler said. The extension would require parliamentary approval and a public vote.
Alongside funding, the government is imposing stricter delivery rules. Projects must reach a defined preliminary design stage before entering an expansion phase, and greater flexibility in technical standards is expected to curb cost escalation.
Digitalisation also plays a central role. Rösti confirmed that CHF 2bn (€2.18bn) has been reserved for digital rail systems, with the explicit aim of unlocking capacity on existing infrastructure. “The goal is to use existing lines more efficiently and increase capacity without additional major construction,” he said, pointing to ERTMS-enabled shorter headways as a key lever.
What happens next, and what changes in how Switzerland builds rail
Transport ’45 now moves into a formal consultation phase, with DETEC due to publish the draft by end-June 2026. After that, the Federal Council plans to submit a message to Parliament in early 2027, with parliamentary consideration through 2027 and — if the process holds — a public vote as early as 2028, tied to the VAT mechanism that underpins the rail funding envelope.
The sequencing is important because the government is explicitly coupling the investment pipeline to financing legitimacy. In the Q&A, Rösti made clear that Transport ’45 is being designed as a coherent package rather than a menu of standalone schemes; if voters or Parliament reject the VAT extension, the rail programme would have to be reprioritised. “It would be difficult to say already now which project we would not build, because it is an overall strategy — a coherent package,” he said, adding that without approval, “we would have to discuss again, prioritise again, and make a new proposal.”
At the same time, the consultation will be where DETEC spells out the politically sensitive part Switzerland has so far only signalled: which previously approved projects should be delayed or dropped. Hostettler also indicated that the Federal Council will use the June consultation to decide which elements of the 2030 and 2035 service concepts are still required, which can be pushed back, and which may be abandoned.
The shift is also about how projects advance through the system. Rösti said the government wants to stop approving ideas that later explode in cost, and instead force delivery discipline earlier in the pipeline. “Project costs must align with budgets. We have to develop a ‘design-to-cost’ approach,” he said.
Read more:
UK, Switzerland forge ahead with direct train link plans – but how close are we really?
Solar panels under a train? Switzerland starts testing first rail-mounted solar power plant
SBB looking to lease 40 new high-speed trains in Swiss first
Tags:
ERTMS
European rail policy
rail capacity
rail digitalisation
rail funding
rail infrastructure
rail investment
rail megaprojects
rail policy
Swiss Federal Council
Swiss rail
Switzerland
timetable frequency
Transport ’45
Zurich–Bern
E-mailFacebook𝕏TwitterLinkedInWhatsApp
Author: Thomas Wintle
E-mailURL
Related posts
track redesignLatvia’s Rail Baltica chief expects 3-5 year delay of the first phase
The first phase of Rail Baltica will face a delay of three to five years, according to Maris Dzelme, board. chairman of Latvia’s project’s manager, Eiropas Dzelzcela Linijas…
29 January 2026
'Embarrassing'‘We’ve lost our way’: UK MPs reject plan to put rail electrification into GBR’s legal duties
UK parliament has rejected a proposed amendment to the Railways Bill that would have required Great British Railways (GBR) to commit to a rolling programme of rail electrification,…
29 January 2026
Adamuz and CataloniaSpain approves €20m aid package for train crash victims
Spain’s government has approved a €20 million compensation package for victims of the January train crashes in Adamuz in Córdoba and Gelida in Catalonia, moving to accelerate payouts…
28 January 2026
Add your comment
characters remaining.
Log in through one of the following social media partners to comment.
FacebookGoogleLinkedIn
Railtech Europe '26‘If Europe pauses now, a decade of rail investment could go to waste’: UNIFE chief UNIFE Director General Enno Wiebe has warned that Europe risks surrendering its global...
Deadline February 6Submit your innovation for the RailTech Innovation Award Submissions for the RailTech Innovation Award are open again! The prize for the...
Sign up for the RailTech Newsletter
Receive the latest news from the railway sector directly into your mailbox!
year at a glanceNew connections, construction milestones and policy developments: here’s what 2026 will bring EU rail From new cross-border train connections to developments in ambitious infrastructure projects, and from...
ferromobileNot trains, but vans are set to revive France’s abandoned railway tracks Rusty rails will soon meet high-tech innovation: abandoned tracks in the Auvergne region...
Partners
Top posts
Most read
Budapest-Belgrade trains by spring? Hungary’s section could open in February, pending a safety audit
Manchester Mayor clashes with Labour Party and the sector over Northern Powerhouse Rail
Shut out of Temple Mills, Italy’s FS is still targeting a Channel Tunnel launch - one year before Virgin
Nine-day rail closure north of Edinburgh as electrification work ramps up
Rail Baltica: LTG Infra blocked again from signing €100m signalling contract after Alstom challenge